USPTO serial 79069706
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers, particularly wheat beer, non-alcoholic beer, beer with reduced alcohol, mixed drinks comprised primarily of beer; mineral waters, aerated beverages and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely aerated waters, aerated fruit juices, and aerated fruit drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups for beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely distilled spirits, wines, alcoholic beverages of fruit, sparkling wines, aperitifs, cordials, liqueurs, brandy, cognac | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Serving food and drink; temporary accommodations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |