USPTO serial 79069739
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CH
CH-1225 CHENE-BOURG, CH
CH-1225 Chêne-Bourg, CH
CH-1225 Chêne-Bourg, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aaron Y. Silverstein
Aaron Y. Silverstein Saunders & Silverstein LLP14 Cedar Street, Suite 224Amesbury, MA 01913-1831UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Laundering and ironing of linen; pressing of clothing; cleaning, repair and renovation of textile articles, leather articles and clothing made of these materials; maintenance of leather articles, textile articles, clothing made of these materials and of carpets and rugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | [ [ Treatment in the nature of reviving textiles articles, leather articles, clothing made of these materials, namely, applying finishes to textiles articles, leather articles and clothing made of these materials; bleaching of textiles articles, leather articles and clothing made of these materials; chemical treatment of textiles articles, leather articles and clothing made of these materials; dyeing for textile and leather; finishing and coating of textiles; and ] mold prevention treatment of textiles articles [, leather articles and clothing made of these materials ] ; waterproofing of textiles articles [, leather articles and clothing made of these materials; whitening of textiles articles and clothing made of these materials ] ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY NOT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 30, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |