USPTO serial 79069745
CAFEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAFEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Dreitler
Joseph R. Dreitler Bricker & Eckler, LLP100 S. Third StreetColumbus, OH 43215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Synthetic sugar-free substitutes and artificial sweeteners | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Non-dairy coffee creamer | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, cocoa, drinking chocolate, namely, chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; chocolate and sweet products, namely, in bar form, namely, those containing milk and fruit products; fine bakery goods; coffee, cocoa and chocolate based beverages, namely, those containing milk products, flavourings, and sweeteners in instant form; natural sugar substitutes and sweeteners | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, those containing coffee, cocoa, chocolate, milk products and/or fruit products, namely fruit juice and fruit drinks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Restaurant services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |