Drawing for WATER DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE

USPTO serial 79069836

WATER DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATER DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising services; business management; business administration; office functions; dissemination of advertising material in the form of leaflets, prospectuses, printed matter, samples; arranging newspapers subscriptions (for others); business organisation and management consulting; accounting; document reproduction; employment agencies; computerised file management; organisation of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; online advertising on a computer network; rental of advertising time on any means of communication; publishing of advertising texts; rental of advertising space; dissemination of advertising matter; public relationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Repair of water treatment and water distribution apparatus and installations for distributing and treating water, and information relating theretoSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
039Water distribution, and information relating theretoSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
040Treatment of water, and information relating theretoSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and technical research with relation to water; advice on the environment, namely providing advisory services in the field of environmental sciences, and information relating thereto, namely, the detection of contaminants in water and water purificationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 6, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 8, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 22, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 4, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 3, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 20, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance