Drawing for MINFENG

USPTO serial 79069854

MINFENG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3856873Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 5, 2010
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINFENG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Air conditioners; Fans for air-conditioning, namely, electric fans, ceiling fans, ventilating exhaust fans; Filters for air conditioners; Air filters, namely, air filters for domestic use, air filters for air conditioning units, air filters for industrial installations; Air reheaters; Air coolers, namely, evaporative air coolers, charge air coolers; Air conditioning apparatus; Ice making machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 27, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 23, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 25, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 12, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 12, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 5, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 19, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 26, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 26, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 26, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 28, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance