Drawing for KST

USPTO serial 79069886

KST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3845386Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 7, 2010
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric current generators; electrical lathe turning machines; electrical machines, namely, static and dynamic uninterruptible power supply units (UPS) that provide short term uninterrupted power to equipmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Electric power supplies; apparatus designed for operating, distributing, accumulating, regulating or controlling electric current, namely, static and dynamic power suppliesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Design services for others in the field of electrical systems and building, research and maintenance of electrical systems, in particular, relating to static and dynamic uninterruptible power supply (UPS) units; technological consultation in the field of electrical system design and development, in particular, relating to static or dynamic uninterruptible power supply (UPS) unitsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 26, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 22, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 14, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 14, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 7, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 7, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 22, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 2, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 18, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 9, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 18, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 23, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 23, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance