USPTO serial 79069909
DYNALITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 2010
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNALITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dynalite Intelligent Light Pty Limited
MASCOT NSW 2020, AU
Other trademarks owned by Dynalite Intelligent Light Pty Limited
Dynalite Intelligent Light Pty Limited
AU
Other trademarks owned by Dynalite Intelligent Light Pty Limited
Dynalite Intelligent Light Pty Limited
AU
Other trademarks owned by Dynalite Intelligent Light Pty Limited
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digitally operable building sensor systems, namely, a system primarily comprised of passive infrared motion detector and infrared remote control receiver; motion detector for a desired part of a building or the like; electronic security system for a building or the like, namely, a security system primarily comprised of electronic motion detectors, sensors, transmitters and receivers; motion detector security system and apparatus therefor, namely, a security system primarily comprised of electronic motion detectors, sensors and controls; apparatus for controlling commercial and industrial lighting systems, namely, electric lighting controls, dimmers and electro mechanical controls for use in operating lighting; apparatus for controlling the occurrence and level of lighting in a building or the like, namely, detectors, sensors, remote controls for use with lighting, dimmers and computer controls for remotely controlling lighting; automated lighting time clock and lighting event controller, namely, timing sensors and detectors and electro mechanical and electric controls for controlling the use and level of lighting as determined by specific times or events; apparatus for programming and automatically setting the required lighting levels of lights in a building or the like at predetermined times during a predetermined period, namely, computer hardware, computer keypads, electric controls and operating computer software; apparatus for overriding the programmed light setting in a building or the like, namely, computer hardware, computer keypads, electric controls and operating computer software; apparatus for lighting a desired part of a building or the like in response to a sensed motion, namely, sensors, detectors, transmitters, receivers, dimmers and electric controls for same and operating software; automated lighting energy management system and apparatus, namely, computer hardware and computer software; automated lighting event controlled security system comprised of motion sensors, detectors, computer hardware and operating software and electrical controllers; none of the foregoing goods to be used for photographic purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dynalite Intelligent Light Pty Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Dynalite Intelligent Light Pty Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Dynalite Intelligent Light Pty Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DYNALITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |