Drawing for MINDER

USPTO serial 79069910

MINDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3870252Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 2, 2010
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digitally operable building sensor systems, namely, a system primarily comprised of passive infrared motion detector and infrared remote control receiver; motion detector for a desired part of a building or the like; electronic security system for a building or the like, namely, a security system primarily comprised of electronic motion detectors, sensors, transmitters and receivers; motion detector security system and apparatus therefor, namely, a security system primarily comprised of electronic motion detectors, sensors and controls; apparatus for controlling commercial and industrial lighting systems, namely, electric lighting controls, dimmers and electromechanical controls for use in operating lighting; electronic apparatus for controlling the occurrence and level of lighting in a building or the like, namely, electronic light detectors, electronic light sensors, and remote controls for use with lighting, dimmers and computer controls for remotely controlling lighting; automated lighting time clock and lighting event controller, namely, timing sensors and detectors and electromechanical and electric controls for controlling the use and level of lighting as determined by specific times or events; apparatus for programming and automatically setting the required lighting levels of lights in a building or the like at predetermined times during a predetermined period, namely, computer hardware, computer keypads, electric controls and operating computer software; apparatus for lighting a desired part of a building or the like in response to a sensed motion, namely, electronic motion sensors, electronic motion detectors, electronic transmitters, electronic receivers, electronic light dimmers and electric controls for same and operating software; automated lighting energy management system and apparatus, namely, computer hardware and computer software for managing an automated lighting energy systemSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Apparatus for lighting, namely, lamps, ceiling lights, light diffusers; lamp casings; lamp shades; light shades in the nature of lamp shades; globes for lamps; light globes in the nature of lamp globes; light bulbs, lighting tubes, filaments for electric lamps; safety lamps and lights in the nature of lamps; security lamps and lights in the nature of lamps; spotlights; down lights in the nature of overhead lamps and ceiling lights; wall lightsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 4, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 16, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 20, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 9, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 9, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 11, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 2, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 17, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 15, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 7, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 29, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 20, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance