USPTO serial 79069956
REVIDOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3747063Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 9, 2010
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REVIDOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aimee L. Kaplan
AIMEE L. KAPLAN COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic substances in the nature of food adapted for medical use; food for babies; vitamin preparations | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 30, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |