USPTO serial 79070197
DULCOFIBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3896522Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 28, 2010
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DULCOFIBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
DE
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
55218 Ingelheim, DE
Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
55218 Ingelheim, DE
Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
55218 Ingelheim, DE
Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of constipation, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of metabolic disorders, and laxatives; dietetic foods adapted for medical use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | food supplements and dietetic substances, namely, food additives for non-medical use containing carbohydrates and fibers used for non-nutritional purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named DULCOFIBER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |