Drawing for SMARTSHEAR

USPTO serial 79070210

SMARTSHEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARL III, FRED
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTSHEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Hydraulically operated metal working machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 27, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 11, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 6, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 16, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 16, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 16, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 15, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 22, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 22, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 22, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 10, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 10, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 24, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance