USPTO serial 79070306
AEROKLAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3841565Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2010
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with AEROKLAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard W. Kline
Howard W. Kline Nath, Goldberg & Meyer112 S West StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ anti-theft alarms not for motor vehicles ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | [ anti-theft devices for motor vehicles; anti-theft devices for motor vehicles, namely, an anti-theft device for spare tires attached to vehicles; anti-theft devices for motor vehicles, namely, an alarm system that links the vehicle and tires as to prevent the tires from being stolen and removed from the vehicle; ] tonneau covers; [ covers for cars; ] trunk trays, namely, fitted liners for the cargo area of vehicles; [ front and rear automobile bumpers; safety bars for automobiles' roof, namely, roll bars; fender flares; ] side steps; [ side sun visors for motor vehicles; ] land vehicle parts, namely, rail guards for protecting vehicle bed rails from impact and scratch damages, and super guards for protecting vehicles from bugs and stones; [ accessories for motor vehicles, namely, side protectors; ] sun canopies for motor vehicles; [ land vehicle parts, namely, roof box and roof rail; ] automotive aftermarket parts, namely, multi-purpose storage box to be fixed on pick-up trucks [ ; motorized tailgates with compartments for trucks; wheel housing goods, namely, wheel housing panels; Land vehicle parts, namely, heat protection shields placed under the vehicle's hood for use as covers for heat transferring vehicle parts ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | [ window films for vehicles, namely, anti-dazzle films, plastic film that is tinted, laminated or reflective for auto windows; soundproofing and sound dampening materials for automobiles ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | [ rubber floor mats; echo proofing rubber mats ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AEROFLEX INSULATION (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by AEROFLEX INSULATION (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Aeroklas Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named AEROKLAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 10, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |