Drawing for TRULOQ

USPTO serial 79070330

TRULOQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRULOQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia C. Weber

Cynthia C. Weber Sughrue Mion, PLLC2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus, namely, a closed system drug transfer device primarily comprising a vial adapter and a syringe adapterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 30, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 2, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 5, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 21, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 30, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 2, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 17, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 31, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance