Drawing for LIVERCARE

USPTO serial 79070340

LIVERCARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVERCARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations and substances; medicinal preparations and substances; vitamin preparations and substances; mineral preparations and substances; dietetic preparations and substances; herbal preparations and substances; vitamin supplements; mineral supplements; food supplements; dietary supplements; fibre supplements; nutritional additives; fish oil; cod liver oil; royal jelly; kelp for pharmaceutical or medical purposes; laxatives; anti-oxydants; ginsengSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 20, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 28, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 30, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 7, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 4, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 3, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 31, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance