Drawing for BERNARD ZINS

USPTO serial 79070518

BERNARD ZINS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BERNARD ZINS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, footwear (excluding orthopedic footwear); headwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2020UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 9, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 8, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 6, 2019LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 31, 2019LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 21, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 27, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 3, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 30, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 3, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 28, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 5, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 4, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 3, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance