USPTO serial 79070606
ITEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2012
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ITEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Intercontec Pfeiffer Industrie-Steckverbindungen GmbH
94559 Niederwinkling, DE
Other trademarks owned by Intercontec Pfeiffer Industrie-Steckverbindungen GmbH
Intercontec Pfeiffer; Industrie-Steckverbindungen GmbH
94559 Niederwinkling, DE
Other trademarks owned by Intercontec Pfeiffer; Industrie-Steckverbindungen GmbH
Intercontec Pfeiffer; Industrie-Steckverbindungen GmbH
94559 Niederwinkling, DE
Other trademarks owned by Intercontec Pfeiffer; Industrie-Steckverbindungen GmbH
TE Connectivity Industrial GmbH
Niederwinkling, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cable connectors; electrical and electronic connectors; all for industrial use and not for MP3 players | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intercontec Pfeiffer Industrie-Steckverbindungen GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Intercontec Pfeiffer; Industrie-Steckverbindungen GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Intercontec Pfeiffer; Industrie-Steckverbindungen GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by TE Connectivity Industrial GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ITEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2023 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2023 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 28, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 10, 2019 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |