Drawing for CONVIVIA

USPTO serial 79070632

CONVIVIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONVIVIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Ladles, bottle openers, pressure cookers, rice basins, casseroles, pans, milk pots (non electric), colanders, pot covers, asparagus cookers, kettles, grills, round trays, expresso coffee makers, sugar basins, milk jugs, frying pans (non electric), all aforementioned products not of precious metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 6, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 8, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 22, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 21, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 21, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 7, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance