USPTO serial 79070710
ECOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3752557Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 23, 2010
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ECOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-92400 COURBEVOIE, FR
F-92400 COURBEVOIE, FR
COURBEVOIE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell
Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell Blue Filament Law PLLC700 E. Maple RoadSuite 450Birmingham, MI 48009Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Bottles, sold empty; [ pots; jars of glass sold empty; flasks, not of precious metal; ] glass goods, namely, bottles, [ pots, jars and flasks, not of precious metal; glazing materials for decoration, namely, printed glass, lacquered glass, serigraphed glass and painted glass; opaque or translucent enameled glasses for decoration; lacquered glasses for decoration; serigraphed glasses for decoration; painted glasses for decoration; printed glasses for decoration, for use on bottles, pots and jars sold empty; unworked or semiworked glass, excluding building glass] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 23, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |