USPTO serial 79070788
SBG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 8, 2011
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SBG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED
Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA
Other trademarks owned by THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED
THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA; LIMITED
Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA
Other trademarks owned by THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA; LIMITED
THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA; LIMITED
Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA
Other trademarks owned by THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA; LIMITED
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management; business administration; office functions; business advice and information; business planning; business appraisals; business management assistance; economic forecasting and analysis; personnel management; computer database management, compiling of information into computer databases; computer file management; compilation of statistics for business purposes; computerized file management; business administration services for the processing of sales and transactions made on a global computer network or the Internet; business advice and information, provided by telephone or provided on-line from a computer database, computer network, global computer network or the Internet; public relations; business management consultancy and advisory services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Financial analysis, consultation, and management; investment advice, consultation, and management; management of mutual funds and investment funds; financial advice; financing services; currency exchange and advice; issuing of letters of credit; electronic funds transfer; providing information in the fields of banking to United States customers of foreign banks and insurance companies | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA; LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA; LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named SBG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 21, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 19, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 8, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 21, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |