USPTO serial 79070821
ONLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Presentation of goods, namely dried fruits, jams, chocolate coating, coffee-based products, cocoa, cocoa based products, pastry, marzipan, chocolate and chocolate pieces for mixing in, chocolate based products, sugar based products, alcoholic beverages, especially schnapps and liqueurs with chocolate flavour, in miniature cable cars in order to enable consumers to see, taste and purchase the goods; advertising; distribution of samples for advertising purposes; distribution of advertising materials | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment; cultural activities; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes, especially the performance of exhibitions and presentations of production and manufacturing processes for entertainment and educational purposes; demonstration of manufacturing processes for entertainment and educational purposes; presentation of production and manufacturing processes for entertainment and educational purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |