USPTO serial 79070858
DETOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DETOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Sorting machines for various bulk goods, foodstuffs, recyclable material and waste other than hazardous waste; sorting machines using laser beams for sorting bulk goods, foodstuffs, recyclable material and waste other than hazardous waste; sorting machines for sorting foodstuffs, for use in food processing industry; industrial sorting machines and parts therefor, for sorting bulk goods, foodstuffs, recyclable material and waste other than hazardous waste; conveyor belts, chutes, slides, vibration plates, all being parts of machines for sorting foodstuffs, for use in food processing industry; machines for conveying and guiding material streams, namely, conveyor belts, chutes, slides, vibration plates; machines for removing objects out of material streams, namely, machines for sorting bulk goods, foodstuffs, recyclable material and waste other than hazardous waste | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Laser scanners for sorting purposes; computer programs for controlling machines for the industrial processing of foodstuffs; cameras and Charged-Coupled Device cameras used in sorting goods; industrial X-ray apparatus for sorting goods, other than for medical purposes; electrical devices incorporating ultra violet light tubes for attracting and killing of insects and for destroying micro-organisms; optical lenses, optical lens diaphragms, optical mirrors, optical sensors and optical fibers all used in sorting apparatus; lasers, not for medical purposes, laser diodes, solid waste lasers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Sorting of bulk goods, namely, foodstuffs, recyclable material and waste other than hazardous waste; selection of bulk goods; sorting of waste and recyclable material into one or more material streams; sorting of recyclable material and waste other than hazardous waste | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological consulting and research and design services relating to the development of apparatus for the sorting of goods; design and development of computer hardware, electronics in the form of semiconductor chips, integrated-circuit chips, processor chips and computer software for using in sorting apparatuses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology N.V.,; afgekort BEST N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DETOX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |