USPTO serial 79070925
ENZYTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3896524Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 28, 2010
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ENZYTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maury M. Tepper, III
Maury M. Tepper, III Tepper & Eyster, PLLC3724 Benson DriveRaleigh, NC 27609UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for use in science; chemical reagents for laboratory use for non-medical purposes; chemical research reagents for industrial use, namely, for testing food chemistry | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | [ reagents for medical purposes only and not in the fields of allergies, uppermost in connection with respiratory conditions, decongestants and antihistamines ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 22, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |