USPTO serial 79070936
NUTRARED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTRARED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements and dietetic substances adapted for medical use being made of or with cranberry or blueberry or combinations of cranberry and blueberry based powders, extracts and/or oils; pharmaceutical, veterinary and sanitary preparations being made of or with cranberry or blueberry or combinations of cranberry and blueberry based powders, extracts and/or oils; nutritional and health food supplements in breakfast cereal, processed cereal, cereal bar, meal replacement bar, biscuit, muesli and liquid form composed of organically grown plant sprouts, plant or fruit extracts, oils and powders; nutraceuticals for dietary purposes in tablet and liquid form for use as a dietary supplement and food supplements comprised of processed plant sprouts, plant or fruit extracts, oils and powders, for weight loss, weight gain, increasing energy and assisting digestion | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Processed food containing cranberry or blueberry or combinations of cranberry and blueberry as a main component; processed vegetables namely, artichoke, asparagus, aubergine, beans, beet, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, carrot, cauliflower, celeriac, celery, chard, chicory, collards, corn, cress, cucumbers, gourds, Jerusalem artichoke, kales, kohlrabi, leek, lettuce, melons, mushrooms, okra, onions, parsnips, peas, peppers, potatoes, pumpkins, radicchio, radish, rhubarb, rutabaga, shallots, spinach, squash, swede, sweetcorn, sweet potato, tomatoes, turnips, watercress, watermelon, yams; nutritional dietary supplements in capsule, tablet and liquid form for weight loss, weight gain, increasing energy and assisting digestion; processed sprouted seeds and grains processed for eating; beans, flax sprouts, alfalfa sprouts, red clover sprouts, broccoli sprouts, radish sprouts, mustard sprouts, fenugreek sprouts, garlic sprouts, soy sprouts, chick pea, green pea, yellow pea sprouts, canola sprouts; all the aforesaid being processed | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 1, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 13, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |