Drawing for PREMIUMCAL

USPTO serial 79071039

PREMIUMCAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREMIUMCAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

Thomas J. Moore BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 Slaters Lane, Fourth FloorAlexandria, VA 22314-1176UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric and electronic measuring apparatus, namely flow meters, hydrometers and viscosimeters; flow-measuring devices for recording the volume flow rate and mass flow rate parameters of liquids, gases or suspensions, namely flow meters, hydrometers, viscosimeters; all of the aforementioned goods only used in the industrial process automation technology and the industrial process instrumentationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Services for the certification of measuring instruments used for measuring industrial processes, namely flow meters, hydrometers and viscosimeters (term considered too vague by the international bureau (rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); measuring instrument inspections, namely inspections of flow meters, hydrometers and viscosimeters; measuring instrument calibration servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 5, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 20, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 1, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 17, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2010LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 4, 2010LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 1, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 31, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance