USPTO serial 79071050
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food for babies, food and beverages for babies and infants | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; snack foods, sticks and desserts made from fruits or vegetables, fruit slices; gelatins; jams, marmalades and compotes; fruit jams, fruit compotes, purées; preparations made with milk products containing fruit products, fruit pulp and/or fruit flavourings; fruit and vegetable preserves | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Fruit drinks and fruit juices, lemonades and other non-alcoholic beverages; nectars; syrups and other preparations for making beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |