Drawing for SPECTRON

USPTO serial 79071153

SPECTRON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3879226Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 23, 2010
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPECTRON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC412 MAIN ST., 7TH FLOORHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely, agricultural machines and machine apparatus and tools, namely, tillers, sowers, threshers, harvesters, cultipackers, agricultural machines for packing fruits, vegetables, cereals and agricultural produce in generalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
008Manually operated hand apparatus and tools for use in agriculture, namely, hand operated tools for grappling, sorting and packing fruits, vegetables, cereals and agricultural produce in generalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2019UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Aug 29, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 29, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 6, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 6, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 9, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 9, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 28, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 30, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 24, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 23, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 23, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 7, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 7, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 31, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 7, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 7, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 7, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 7, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 2, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Dec 2, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 2, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 6, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Nov 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 28, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 28, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 27, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 27, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 27, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 24, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 21, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Aug 20, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance