USPTO serial 79071203
CRISBAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4173383Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2012
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CRISBAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DK-8200 Aarhus N, DK
DK-8200 Aarhus N, DK
Aarhus N, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan A. Raynes
Evan A. Raynes Symbus Law Group PLLC1775 I Street, NW, Suite 1150Washington, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and installations, namely, machines and installations for fully or partially automated transport, sorting, storage and other handling of baggage, namely, of flight baggage, cargo, mail, packages and of products and materials for use industrially or commercially by use of special made tubs or containers; installations and systems comprised of conveyor machines, carousels, chutes, buffer and conveyor belts, catwalks, ladders, spirals, cages, carrying cases, lifts and tubs for distribution and sorting baggage in airports featuring fully and partially automatic loading and unloading machines, internal intermediate storage, and transportation functions controlled by internal control systems; parts and accessories not included in other classes for the before mentioned machines and installations, namely, carousels, chutes, buffer and conveyor belts, ladders, spirals, cages, carrying cases specially adapted for the aforementioned goods and, lifts | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Electronic and electric apparatus and instruments for weighing, measuring, signaling, tracking and control for use with machines, installations and systems for distribution and handling of baggage, cargo, mail, packages and products, namely, distribution power panels, scales, height and width measuring instruments, RFID reader, programmable Logic Controller, digital input/output modules, safety stop components and electronic operation panels with indicator lamps and push buttons; computer hardware and software, namely, for acquisition of data and for management of communication with other computers, for control of the operation and of the monitoring the reliability of machines and installations and systems for transportation and handling of baggage, for distribution and handling of baggage, cargo, mail, packages and products and for identification and tracking of baggage, cargo, mail, packages and products ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | [ Installation, maintenance and repair of machines, installations and systems for distribution and handling of baggage, cargo, mail, packages and products, and machines for transportation systems using tubs or containers ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Technological consultancy services relating to distribution and handling systems, including preparation of technical requirement analysis; technological development and research in the field of distribution and handling systems for baggage, cargo, products, books, packages, mail and industrial products; technical assistance in software implementation in relation to distribution and handling systems for baggage, cargo, products, books, packages, mail and industrial ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Crisplant A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Crisplant A/S
- Other trademarks owned by BEUMER Group A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CRISBAG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2024 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 1, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 29, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |