USPTO serial 79071249
EXPONA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3757834Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2010
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with EXPONA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Vern
Max Vern Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP90 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Floor coverings for existing floors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 26, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |