USPTO serial 79071252
KNOWLEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KNOWLEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn M. Jordan
Lynn M. Jordan Kelly IP, LLP1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 300WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer, electronic and video games programs and equipment, namely software, tapes, discs, joy sticks, remote controls and interactive floor mats; mouse pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Event programs; paint brushes; printing blocks; posters; cards, postcards; greetings cards; trading cards; invitation cards; diaries; calendars; photograph albums; prints; paper gift bags, gift boxes, paper gift tags and gift wrap paper; notepads; writing instruments and crayons; stickers and transfers; stamps, namely, rubber stamps; personal organisers; address books; note books; pen and pencil holders; desk mat boards; embroidery, sewing and knitting patterns; postage stamps | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | News agency services, namely the transmission of news | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 28, 2013 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 3, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |