Drawing for DPR SYSTEM MINIMAL INVASIVE FOOT SURGERY

USPTO serial 79071278

DPR SYSTEM MINIMAL INVASIVE FOOT SURGERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3803391Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 15, 2010
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DPR SYSTEM MINIMAL INVASIVE FOOT SURGERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical equipment for orthopedics and traumatology, namely, burrs for surgical use; knives for surgical purposes; scissors for surgery; surgical cutlery; brushes for cleaning body cavities; scoring saws and saws for surgical purposes; lasers for medical use; scalpels; ancillary equipment, namely, positioning guides for surgical use, namely, for orthopaedic and traumatologic osteosynthesis; artificial surgical implants for limb and trunk orthopaedic and traumatologic osteosynthesis; joint prostheses; surgical implants comprising artificial material; surgical pins and screws; surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, plates for osteotomy and arthrodesis; surgical screws used for fixing plates during arthrodesis; goods for medical use, namely, pins and pegs for orthopaedic and traumatologic osteosynthesisSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 5, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 27, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 26, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 26, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Sep 20, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 20, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 21, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 21, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 16, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 15, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 30, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 20, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 25, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 6, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 28, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 27, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance