Drawing for VALGRI

USPTO serial 79071292

VALGRI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HODGES, KOURTNEE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALGRI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Cherry tomatoes, oven cooked cherry tomatoes, puree cherry tomatoes, tomato pulp, tomato concentrate, fillet of tomato, dense puree tomato, chunky puree, peeled tomatoes, peeled tomatoes San Marzano DOP (Protected Designation of Origin), chickpeas, borlotti beans, corona beans, cannellini beans, tondini beans, green beans, sweetcorn, peas, mushrooms, precooked wheat for pastiera (Neapolitan cake), potatoes, roast peppers, peachesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 15, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 1, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 27, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 14, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 4, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 2, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 2, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance