USPTO serial 79071292
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cherry tomatoes, oven cooked cherry tomatoes, puree cherry tomatoes, tomato pulp, tomato concentrate, fillet of tomato, dense puree tomato, chunky puree, peeled tomatoes, peeled tomatoes San Marzano DOP (Protected Designation of Origin), chickpeas, borlotti beans, corona beans, cannellini beans, tondini beans, green beans, sweetcorn, peas, mushrooms, precooked wheat for pastiera (Neapolitan cake), potatoes, roast peppers, peaches | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |