USPTO serial 79071301
TANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn M. Jordan
Lynn M. Jordan Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LL901 New York Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, namely, dolls, soft sculpture toys, plush toys, toy and novelty face masks, toy musical boxes, toy musical instruments, toy models, namely, cars, kites, play balls and play balloons,swimming flippers, swim floats and inflatable toys for play recreational purposes, playing cards, puppets, plastic character toys; bath toys, playsets for children, infant developmental toys,wheeled toys, namely, skateboards, roller skates, in-line skates, scooters, bicycles and tricycles, sit on rides, namely, ride-on toys; games, namely, board games, darts, dice, puzzles; playthings,namely, novelties in the form of souvenirs, namely, modeled plastic toy figurines and toy key chains, costumes being children's playthings; sporting articles, namely, baseball gloves,handball gloves, baseball bats, tennis and squash rackets | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |