Drawing for GRANTS

USPTO serial 79071429

GRANTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3835244Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 17, 2010
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRANTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryan Friedman

Bryan Friedman Friedman Stroffe & Gerard19800 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 1100Irvine, CA 92612-2425UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Toothpaste and mouthwashSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 17, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 18, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 11, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2010FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 17, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 1, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 23, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 15, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 28, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance