USPTO serial 79071461
COOLPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3939897Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2011
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COOLPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judson K. Champlin
Judson K. Champlin Westman, Champlin & Kelly, P.A.900 Second Avenue SouthSuite 1400Minneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Polytex Sportbeläge Produktions-Gmbh
- Other trademarks owned by Polytex Sportbeläge Poduktions-Gmbh
- Other trademarks owned by Polytex Sportbeläge Poduktions-Gmbh
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named COOLPLUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |