Drawing for MERKUR

USPTO serial 79071473

MERKUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3835246Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 17, 2010
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MERKUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus

Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Cutlery; razor blades; straight razors; electric and non-electric razors; shaving accessories, razor cases, leather strops for razors, adaptors for razor blades, open tooth combs being parts of razors; electric and non-electric callus shaver blades; electric and non-electric callus shaversACTIVE—
021Shaving brushes; shaving brush holders incorporating soap dishesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 2, 2022CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 8, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2022CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 26, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 10, 2019PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 30, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 29, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Sep 29, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 28, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 18, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 17, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 1, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 26, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 12, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 15, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance