USPTO serial 79071515
BLOODCHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3832076Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2010
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with BLOODCHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin Segall
Karin Segall Leason Ellis LLPOne North Lexington Avenue, Suite 1200White Plains, NY 10601United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Chemical reagents and diagnostic preparations other than for medical or veterinary use; chemicals for use in industry and science ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Chemical reagents and diagnostic preparations for medical [ or veterinary ] use | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Flow cytometers and flow-based analyzers providing cell and particle analysis, detection, or counting for scientific, laboratory, and general research uses ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PROGENIKA BIOPHARMA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PROGENIKA Biopharma S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PROGENIKA Biopharma S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BLOODCHIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 14, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |