USPTO serial 79071552
GRANOLYSER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3860837Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 12, 2010
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with GRANOLYSER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kitzingen, DE
Kitzingen, DE
Kitzingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex Patel
Alex Patel Patel & Almeida, P.C.16830 Ventura Blvd., Suite 360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus and instruments for laboratories, optical analysis, weighing, measurement, and control apparatus and instruments for measuring the quality parameters of grains and seeds, like oil seeds, cereals and starch plants, flour, feed and pet food; electronic testing, control and measurement equipment for testing, controlling and measuring moisture, oil, protein, crude fiber, fiber, fat, ash, starch, sugar, NDF, NFE, ADF, water absorption, color, Hagberg indicator, resistance, extensibility, starch damage, dry matter, glucosinolate, chlorophyll, palmitic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, and linoleic acid in granular, particulate, and pellet-shaped products, in particular agricultural cereals, grain, oil seeds, pulses, seeds and products manufactured therefrom; measurement equipment for performing resistive, capacitative, spectroscopic, electrical current, and optical measurements of bulk agricultural materials using electromagnetic waves; apparatus and instruments for measuring moisture content, temperature, bulk density, sedimentation, falling number, friability, hardness, grain count, damage, disease, and composition analysis of tannins, tannoids and phenols | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Scientific consultation in the field of analytics and the implementation of analytical systems for performing technical and scientific analyses, measurements and controls; scientific and technological services and research work, in particular measurements and analyses of grains and seeds, like oil seeds, cereals and starch plants, flour, feed and pet food; calibration and functional testing of measurement equipment ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |