USPTO serial 79071572
ABSOLUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABSOLUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Global Orthopaedic Technology Pty Ltd
BAULKHAM HILLS NSW 2153, AU
Other trademarks owned by Global Orthopaedic Technology Pty Ltd
Global Orthopaedic Technology Pty Ltd
BAULKHAM HILLS NSW 2153, AU
Other trademarks owned by Global Orthopaedic Technology Pty Ltd
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary A. Donovan
MARY A DONOVAN DONOVAN & YEE LLP161 AVENUE OF THE STARSSUITE 1201NEW YORK, NY 10013Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Surgical adhesives and cements for orthopaedic purposes; bone cement for surgical and orthopaedic purposes | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Surgical implants made of artificial materials being orthopaedic hip prostheses; parts for the aforementioned orthopaedic articles, namely, screws, stems, wedges and cables; surgical apparatus and instruments for orthopaedic surgery | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2020 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 13, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |