USPTO serial 79071583
BAKED ON RTF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3835248Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 17, 2010
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAKED ON RTF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey E. Fine
Brian B. Diekhoff Polsinelli Shughart PC100 South Fourth StreetSuite 1000St. Louis, MO 63102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Caps and protective shields for medical syringes, needle syringes and syringes for injections for medical and veterinary purposes; syringes for medical purposes; injection instruments and apparatus with needles for medical and veterinary purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |