Drawing for ALEADER

USPTO serial 79071588

ALEADER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3822073Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 20, 2010
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ALEADER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Curtis Krechevsky

Curtis Krechevsky Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church StreetFloor 22Hartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the electronic industry for detecting defect of electronic products produced with SMT (Surfaced Mounting Technology); wrapping machines; washing machines for clothes; plastic jetting-moulding machines; machine tools for metalworking, cutting materials; elevators; starters for motors and engines; metalworking spinning machines; metalworking machines; metalworking machines for cold working for the opticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 22, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 24, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 20, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 20, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 15, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 21, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 20, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 4, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2009RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 30, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 8, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance