Drawing for LIPPROX

USPTO serial 79071616

LIPPROX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3814739Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 6, 2010
Examiner
BOONE, JOHN C
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with LIPPROX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Suzanne K. Ketler

Suzanne K. Ketler McDonald Hopkins LLC600 Superior Avenue East, Suite 2100Cleveland, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Grinding wheels for use in power-operated grinding machines and apparatus, including grinding wheels for fine grinding made of abrasive sponge, abrasive cloth and abrasives combined with plasticACTIVE—
008Grinding wheels for use in manually-operated grinding machines and apparatus, including grinding wheels for fine grinding made of abrasive sponge, abrasive cloth and abrasives combined with plasticACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2021EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2021EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 24, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 30, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 6, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 25, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 25, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 25, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 16, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 6, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 19, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 7, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 20, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 15, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2009RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Sep 24, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 8, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance