USPTO serial 79071628
SCHUMAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3841577Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2010
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SCHUMAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day35 West 35th StreetSuite 900New York, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and mechanical installations in the nature of machines for material processing of steel bars and steel tubes; machines and mechanical installations in the nature of machines for metal working; industrial peeling machines for drawing and peeling steel bars; straightening machines for straightening rolled or forged bars and tubes; machines for cold and hot forming steel bars and steel tubes, namely, for multi-stage cold and hot forming; structural parts for machines and mechanical installation for rod and tube handling systems; winding machines and bar drawing machines; carriage type drawing machines for drawing steel bars and tubes; tractors; mechanical drawing installations in the nature of machines for drawing and straightening bars and steel tubes; tube welding installations, namely, electric welding machines for welding tubes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |