USPTO serial 79071748
MARTEGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3924834Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 1, 2011
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MARTEGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Myers
Jonathan Myers LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 Broad Street21st FloorNew York, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HAND TOOLS AND NON-ELECTRIC KNIVES IN THE NATURE OF HAND-OPERATED CUTTING TOOLS HAVING HANDLES WITH EXCHANGEABLE AND RETRACTABLE BLADES, namely, BOX CUTTERS, SAFETY CUTTERS, [ SCRAPERS, ] CARPET KNIVES, UTILITY KNIVES, UTILITY KNIVES HAVING AN ERGONOMIC PLASTIC BODY FITTED WITH A WEAR-RESISTANT METAL SKID AT THE BLADE OUTLET, AUTOMATIC BLADE RETRACTION SAFETY KNIVES, SPRING-LOADED KNIVES, [ METAL DETECTABLE PLASTIC (MDP) SAFETY KNIVES, ] AND ROTARY BLADE SAFETY KNIVES, ALL USED FOR THE PURPOSE OF A UTILITY KNIFE AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF BOX-CUTTING, CUTTING PLASTIC SHEETING, CUTTING CARPET, CUTTING ARTWORK, AND DEBURRING KNIVES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 27, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |