Drawing for MICRON

USPTO serial 79071770

MICRON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICRON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for grinding of work pieces, accessory parts for machines, in particular grinding discsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 10, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 16, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 21, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 8, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 19, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 25, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 30, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 17, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance