Drawing for AERO-MILL

USPTO serial 79071773

AERO-MILL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3822083Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 20, 2010
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AERO-MILL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryant E. Wade/Jessica S. Sachs

Bryant E. Wade/Jessica S. Sachs Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200Troy, MI 48098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Tool bits being parts of machines; milling cutters being parts of machines [ ; electric hand held drills; drilling bits being parts of machines; drill chucks being parts of machines; drilling heads being parts of machines; reamers being parts of machines ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 21, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 10, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 10, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 9, 2020EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
May 12, 2020PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
May 12, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 15, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 20, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 4, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 10, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 5, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 23, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 18, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 21, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 20, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 4, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 14, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 13, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance