USPTO serial 79071936
INSTREAMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3995744Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2011
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with INSTREAMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne Abelman
Julianne Abelman Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP950 3rd Avenue, Suite 2400New York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric and electronic devices and instruments for information processing and data collection and transmission in the nature of data collection terminals and computer hardware for use in networks, namely, for use in audio-video systems, for use in audio systems, and for use in announcement and paging systems; computer programs recorded on computer media for use in providing audio, video and multimedia data over a network; computer firmware and software for use in network communications, namely, for use in distributing audio, video and multimedia data; devices for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound and images, namely, network interface cards, digital audio players, and alarm devices, comprised of speakers, sensors, sirens and amplifiers, excluding alarms for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [Development and design and maintenance of computer programs for data collection and data transmission for others; technical research and consultation in the field of data collection] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2022 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 19, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 24, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |