Drawing for SICMA

USPTO serial 79071977

SICMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3838062Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 24, 2010
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SICMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronni S. Jillions

Ronni S. Jillions FisherBroyles, LLP1625 K Street, NWSuite 550Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and machine tools for agriculture other than hand-operated, namely cultivators, harvesters, disk harrows, seeders, chippers, tillers, shredders, lawn mowers, and fork liftsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 3, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 7, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 11, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 10, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 10, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 10, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 31, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 24, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 19, 2010ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 3, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 13, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 24, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance