Drawing for BIOND

USPTO serial 79072015

BIOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for the electrochemical treatment of liquidsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 16, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 13, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 27, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 27, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 27, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 27, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 30, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 29, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2009RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance