Drawing for NANOTEK

USPTO serial 79072023

NANOTEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3899316Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 4, 2011
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOTEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pasquale A. Razzano

Pasquale A. Razzano Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto1290 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10104-3800UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Tobacco products, namely, cigarettes, smoking tobacco, cut tobacco, leaf tobacco, chewing tobacco and snuffSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 17, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 3, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 4, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 19, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 13, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 7, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 15, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 18, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance