USPTO serial 79072114
PILLIVUYT FRANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3832099Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2010
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PILLIVUYT FRANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Tableware services made of porcelain, namely, services comprising dishware, [ stemware, ] serving ware for serving food, dishes, salad dishes, plates, butter dishes, bowls, [ condiment shakers, ] fondue pots without a heat source, casserole dishes, [ candle holders of porcelain, ] pitchers, vases, [ flowerpot holders, ] coffee sets, namely, sets comprising coffee cups and saucers, creamer pitchers, sugar bowls, cafetières for making coffee, decanters, [ cheese-dish covers, ] eggcups, fruit cups, [ knife rests, ] household jugs, cookery and baking moulds, [ small bottles sold empty, flower pots, supports for flower arrangements, namely, flower pot holders, basins, ] vegetable dishes, [ pie servers, ] salt cellars, sugar bowls, cups, tea services and teapots, [ bathroom accessories, namely, household jugs, ] all the foregoing goods made of porcelain | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 1, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |